Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 00:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 84.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 658
67% 540 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1410 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 89.4
54% 73.6 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 49.3
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 436 443 431 408 399 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 442
Mixed 420
SusWrite 424
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 45.3
143% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 216
179% 257 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 123%
WD My Book 25EE 4TB
757GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 99 100 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 97.8
Write 99.8
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 99
129% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 100%
Adata Classic C008 USB 2.0 16GB-$10
10GB free, PID c08a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 6.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 13.6
15% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
55% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 32.9
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 26.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $138

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $608
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback