Hetzner vServer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHetzner vServer  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory0.6 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171111
Uptime267 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '21 at 14:38
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Skylake, IBRS)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Memory 23.5
1-Core 53.4
2-Core 137
36% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 125
16% 124 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 82GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 416 437 438 418 434 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.1% Above average
Read 304
Write 530
Mixed 446
SusWrite 427
97% 427 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 9.4
31% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 66.8
DQ Mixed 60.7
42% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x7GB
1 of 1 slots used
7GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 3.7
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 296
14% 296 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback