Acer Aspire 4349

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire 4349  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer HMA41_HR
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '21 at 07:35
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 78.1
44% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 78.2
8-Core 79.2
10% 78.7 Pts
64-Core 78.6
5% 78.6 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Acer(1025 0622) 896MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2342
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
378GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 45 35 39 35 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 84.1
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 38.6
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 50%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 3.3 4.8 2.2 3 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
7.19% Terrible
Read 32.2
Write 5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 3.2
12% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.19%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-055.A00LF Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 4349 Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback