HP p6-2260ea

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2260ea  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150108
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 16:58
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 195
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 508
52% 422 Pts
64-Core 493
30% 493 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1972) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.3
Reflection 69.3
Parallax 62.4
49% 64 fps
MRender 66.5
Gravity 61.5
Splatting 54
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 148 61 49 55 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 253
Write 234
Mixed 12
SusWrite 103
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.6
40% 10.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
299GB free
Firmware: 0636
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 92 91 92 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 54.3
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 89.7
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 66%
Flash USB Disk 30GB
17GB free, PID 3238
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 2.6 7.4 3.9 2.7 7.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.62% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 2.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.6
9% 7.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial ST102464BA160B.16F 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2260ea Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6-2260ea

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback