HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	HP EliteBook 8560w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1631
Memory	27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '17 at 10:30
Run Duration	97 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	39% Below average	Memory 60.1 1-Core 20.9 2-Core 57.2 31% 46.1 Pts	4-Core 98.7 8-Core 144 15% 121 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M 6,108 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1631) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.51 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.25 fps	MRender 5.57 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mk0400gc TZA 400GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5DV1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 130 130 15592168 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1368 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1030 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 120 (AF) Unknown 100 100 4311351969 (B4) Unknown 130 130 27411732 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 62 638976038 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 4294967295 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535	72.2% Very good	Read 446 Write 450 Mixed 449 100% 448 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 29.4 4K Mixed 17.9 64% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 73.9 80% 132 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	MC Read 14.4 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.5 44% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 127 31% 127 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	91x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	77x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $230Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	64x

GPU
Quadro 1000MNvidiaBench 3%, 6,108 samples	291x
Quadro 2000MNvidiaBench 5%, 3,227 samples	127x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	190x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	64x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363