Asrock Z77E-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77E-ITX  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '21 at 14:35
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 82.9
2-Core 176
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 308
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 55.7
36% 48.9 fps
MRender 45.6
Gravity 43
Splatting 32.5
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 267 103 94 92 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 465
Mixed 341
SusWrite 175
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 46.6
152% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 339
262% 358 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
151GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 73.7
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54%
Great: 76%
ACASIS 250GB
76GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 207 190 162 184 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 329
Write 319
Mixed 286
SusWrite 202
379% 284 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 23.7
1,745% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 26.7
DQ Mixed 25.4
1,866% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 174%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77E-ITX Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77E-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback