Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '21 at 06:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$54
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
86% 157 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 418
55% 413 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.5% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 62.8
33% 54.1 fps
MRender 59.3
Gravity 46.4
Splatting 42.7
40% 49.5 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe 128GB-$93
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 674
Write 326
Mixed 312
96% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 41.7
159% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 395
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 251
218% 324 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 114%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 158 154 155 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 139
Write 104
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 156
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FADM 1315 BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FADM 24GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 10.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $893
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback