Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-DB15BD556843C820
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '17 at 22:37
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 426
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M390
Apple(106B 014E) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2001.0
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Lighting 27.1
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 34.3
22% 30.5 fps
MRender 27
Gravity 24
Splatting 35.8
24% 29 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW5TA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,739
Write 1,154
Mixed 1,353
314% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 8.27
46% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 136
109% 144 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 160%
Great: 203%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0108
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 89.7
Write 80.9
Mixed 63.4
58% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 4.16
4K Mixed 0.47
158% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D54343147533642465238412D52442020 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.7
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback