Asrock H77 Pro4-M

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H77 Pro4-M (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 24 '21 at 11:39
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340-$278 8,792 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 79.7 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 171 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 341 40% 309 Pts	64-Core 324 20% 324 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3757) CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 20.5 Parallax 23.2 20% 22.9 fps	MRender 26.6 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 18.8 19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
As25 240GB 240GB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1022A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 121 49 37 41 38 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.5% Average	Read 253 Write 223 Mixed 229 SusWrite 80.6 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 22.2 87% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 45.1 71% 134 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 104%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 170GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 101 101 100 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 98.9 Write 86.8 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 99.3 64% 86.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDT725025VLA380 250GB-$132 6,580 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 194GB free Firmware: V5DOA7EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 60.7 Write 62.8 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 54.7 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 35%
Seagate ST92505610AS 250GB 132 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 160GB free Firmware: SD26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 74 74 72 73 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 87.9 Write 89.7 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 72.6 58% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33 44,469 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 152GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 91 90 92 91 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	54.3% Above average	Read 99 Write 96.6 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 90.2 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 68%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 437GB free Firmware: JA0OA710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 33 25 27 40 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 80.2 Write 3.7 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 32.7 25% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 57%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 392GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 102 102 103 104 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 103 Write 102 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 100 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 60%
Maxtor Basics Desktop 250GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 90GB free, PID 7410 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 30.9 Write 15.7 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 17 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 19%
Generic External 160GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 110GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 26.1 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 16.8 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608DT1TX0. 4x4GB 1,688 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	50.2% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 18.5 MC Mixed 15.8 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 15.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H77 Pro4-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	36x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	28x
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $80Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	7x
X3 240GBTcsunbowBench 78%, 3,491 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	6x
PSD38G13332 1x8GBPatriotBench 26%, 879 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $577

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383