Asrock AM1B-MDH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock AM1B-MDH  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366x768x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '21 at 11:15
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 53.6
1-Core 32
2-Core 63.9
32% 49.8 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 124
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) 2GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 21.7
13% 21.8 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 20
16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 40 52 72 78 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 85.2
Write 70.1
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 65.4
54% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99U5471-058.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 7
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 7.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1B-MDH Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1B-MDH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 10% - Very poor Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback