Today's hottest deals

Medion MD34257/C794

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion MD34257/C794  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B360H4-EM
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 21:34
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 224
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 604
68% 534 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
Sapphire(174B 9438) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.80
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)
49.6% Average
Lighting 61.1
Reflection 61.6
Parallax 56.5
50% 59.7 fps
MRender 61.5
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 57.5
49% 60.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSD 1TB
587GB free
Firmware: 2364
SusWrite @10s intervals: 528 563 549 571 575 572 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 537
Write 564
Mixed 536
SusWrite 560
124% 549 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 32
4K Mixed 25.3
81% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 131
96% 124 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$34
752GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 7.5
Mixed 11.9
8% 9.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.6% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD34257/C794 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Medion MD34257/C794

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback