MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive161% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 303
43% 318 Pts
64-Core 263
16% 263 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(1642 3E32) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.79
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 20.2
10% 16.9 fps
MRender 18.3
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 16.2
15% 19 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S5 512GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 513 710 711 732 444 478 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
161% Outstanding
Read 1,417
Write 740
Mixed 705
SusWrite 598
192% 865 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 48.4
146% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 483
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 609
423% 526 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 161%
Great: 289%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 029E CMK8GX4M1A2666C16 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 3,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback