MSI MS-1799

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GL72M 7REX
MotherboardMSI MS-1799  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJan 23 '21 at 09:52
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 188
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 371
50% 373 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 11C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 0.2
4% 15 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 0
2% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LDLC 120GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0423A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 35 5.2 24 16 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 483
Write 388
Mixed 339
SusWrite 71
71% 320 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.3
36% 9.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 87%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB
187GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 98.1
Write 92.4
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 62.3
60% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.3
156% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 72%
SDXC Card 128GB
95GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 24 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 26.1
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 25.1
34% 25.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.5
75% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 45%
Linux File-Stor Gadget 7GB
5GB free, PID 4228
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 11 3.3 3.9 3.1 3.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 27.9
Write 15.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 4.7
23% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 4.4
432% 5.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1799 Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1799

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback