MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B93
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 67.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 216
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 755
70% 584 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Gigabyte(1458 37B2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 174
Parallax 176
145% 176 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 156
Splatting 131
126% 158 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 99 85 83 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 476
Write 427
Mixed 369
SusWrite 117
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 46.9
161% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 115%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
52GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 212 229 223 225 247 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65% Good
Read 472
Write 234
Mixed 234
SusWrite 221
64% 290 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 23
88% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 122
92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%
Gigabyte GP-ASM2NE2256GTTDR 256GB
58GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,479
Write 993
Mixed 1,081
262% 1,184 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.7
213% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 965
DQ Mixed 716
575% 799 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 215%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
97GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 52 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 81
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 54.6
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
505GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 75.6
Write 42.4
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 92.8
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%
MDT MD75 00AAVS-00D7B0 750GB
222GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 38 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 37
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 26.1
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 23.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93) Builds (Compare 4,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PRO CARBON WIFI (MS-7B93)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback