Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '21 at 01:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Memory 91.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 257
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 949
87% 731 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$275
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 146
Parallax 144
117% 145 fps
MRender 177
Gravity 125
Splatting 114
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 112%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SABRENT 1TB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT303.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,108
Write 2,421
Mixed 1328
1,209% 1,619 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 75.1
13,274% 95.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,304
DQ Write 1,513
DQ Mixed 1,647
14,396% 1,488 MB/s
Poor: 100% Great: 100%
TrekStor DS maxi light 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 003f
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 23.4
Write 7.5
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 36
27% 20.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.5
207% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4133 C19 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 31
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.3
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 28.8
89% 31.1 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 101%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $254

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $909
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback