Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 19:08
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$105
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 759
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 991
61% 991 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 135
Parallax 123
96% 125 fps
MRender 94.5
Gravity 128
Splatting 115
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 263 257 263 267 265 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 414
Write 264
Mixed 297
SusWrite 262
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 31.8
122% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 184
165% 251 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 57.2
MC Mixed 42.7
137% 47.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 23.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 57.7
69% 57.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 123%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $853
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback