Pcware IPMH110P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPcware IPMH110P  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON IPMH110P
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170309
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 03:04
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
Socket 1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 162
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 224
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
AMD(1002 0B04) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 25.8
Parallax 22.9
13% 21.6 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 15.3
Splatting 20
16% 20 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 55 47 53 51 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 79.5
Write 85.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 49.6
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate ST3500630NS 500GB-$53
68GB free
Firmware: 3CNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 65 66 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 70
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 64.8
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF464128CK8I6GKSEG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.5% Good
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 21.9
66% 23.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 18.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH110P Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Pcware IPMH110P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $97
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback