Asus P8H77-V LE

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-V LE (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '21 at 17:56
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3340-$278 8,792 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 175 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 311 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325 82,117 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Asus(1043 04ED) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50% Average	Lighting 64.2 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 86.3 52% 75 fps	MRender 65.3 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 46.4 45% 56.9 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$45 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 127 128 93 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.6% Good	Read 359 Write 340 Mixed 335 SusWrite 111 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 35.3 116% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 36.1 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 52.8 45% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$45 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 450GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 128 131 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 362 Write 340 Mixed 335 SusWrite 129 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 36.7 121% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.8 DQ Write 99.8 DQ Mixed 52.2 44% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 125%
SSD 240GB 240GB 5,968 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 223GB free Firmware: Q0816C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 196 195 197 200 199 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.5% Average	Read 220 Write 202 Mixed 201 SusWrite 196 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 18.2 81% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 27.3 DQ Write 80.1 DQ Mixed 22.7 26% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 90%
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 161GB free Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 128 131 131 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.7% Average	Read 215 Write 208 Mixed 113 SusWrite 129 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 23.7 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 28.6 95% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 30.4 DQ Write 82.1 DQ Mixed 25.9 28% 46.1 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 105%
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 80GB free Firmware: P0510E SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 129 129 129 94 70 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53% Above average	Read 205 Write 168 Mixed 192 SusWrite 113 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 44.8 4K Mixed 34.3 112% 36.2 MB/s	DQ Read 39.4 DQ Write 84.6 DQ Mixed 52.8 43% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 95%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$88 37,583 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 908GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 145 146 147 146 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 145 Write 137 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 145 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 87%
SafeNet eToken 7300 4GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.3 9.2 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 17.9 Write 9 Mixed 12.2 SusWrite 9.2 15% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 4.9 322% 5.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G 04CB 10242397 JM1600KLN-4G 04CB 10242397 16GB 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.6% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.7 MC Mixed 18 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.5 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-V LE Builds (Compare 1,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V LE - $110

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	402x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	128x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	100x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	75x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	74x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	55x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	26x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	19x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $494

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16