Today's hottest deals

Vultr VC2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVultr VC2  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 15 '21 at 12:42
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon (Cascadelake)
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 45.7
1-Core 84
2-Core 180
55% 103 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 182
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 86GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 805 868 848 879 894 889 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 6.9
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 4
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 177
22% 177 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback