PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AA8h |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20151023 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 14 '21 at 21:30 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
37.1%
Below average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Nvidia(10DE 0472) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44
|
0.42%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intenso SATAIII 256GB
206GB free
Firmware: T0929A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 172 171 198 195 184 MB/s
|
41.4%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 51 24 20 19 17 MB/s
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
|||
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
234GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 19 22 23 21 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 44GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
|
19.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 10x |
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 8x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $20Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 7x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $89 |