Today's hottest deals

Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus M52BC_M32BC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 93.3
49% 75.1 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 211
22% 178 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
HP(103C 8465) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.7% Poor
Lighting 36.1
Reflection 39.8
Parallax 37.4
29% 37.8 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 26.8
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$65
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 10 8.5 9 9.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.18% Terrible
Read 9.2
Write 16.8
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 8.7
8% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 5.18%
Great: 41%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
183GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 102 101 97 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 128
Write 121
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 100
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 70%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 4.3 4.1 6.1 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 3
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.7
10% 9.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 9%
Seagate Expansion Desk 256GB
166GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 23 26 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.1% Poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 25.9
37% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 4.6
342% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 163%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.9
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback