Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200704 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 14 '21 at 12:14 |
| Run Duration | 481 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
43.3%
Average
|
45% 77.7 Pts
|
29% 258 Pts
|
27% 440 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 34D5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
|
0.92%
Terrible
|
1% 0.67 fps
|
0% 0.57 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 41 0.6 0.6 4.7 8.7 MB/s
|
35%
Below average
|
44% 60 MB/s
|
136% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C 2x4GB
2 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
16%
Very poor
|
15% 5.33 GB/s
|
10% 3.4 GB/s
|
31% 127 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 550 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Intel X79 (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples | 231x |
| Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples | 129x |
| Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples | 63x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 550AMD $79Bench 14%, 79,894 samples | 32x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $115Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 31x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $104 |