Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V15.5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V15.5  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V15.5
Memory6.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '21 at 18:31
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 129
2-Core 238
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 604
65% 517 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1D05 1085) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 6.4
5% 20.8 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-00000 512GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,348
Write 2,096
Mixed 1,612
449% 2,019 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 74.6
246% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 970
735% 993 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 316%
USB3.0 Super Speed 1TB
910GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
69% Good
Read 41.5
Write 41.1
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 41.3
56% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 3.9
743% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 11.9
1,093% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 24.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 66.1
61% 66.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V15.5 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V15.5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback