PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star H310 Gaming Trident3 (MS-B920) |
Motherboard | MSI MS-B9201 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180301 |
Uptime | 3.8 Days |
Run Date | Jan 11 '21 at 09:14 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
89.6%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 71 76 80 78 MB/s
|
49.1%
Average
|
|||
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.9 3.3 5.1 5.3 4.8 MB/s
|
5.59%
Terrible
|
|||
Sharkoon Extreme 16GB
15GB free, PID 0902
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 171 171 172 171 173 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16
11GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.3 5.8 5.8 MB/s
|
9.53%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 273x |
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 221x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 211x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 123x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 118x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 102x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 108% - Outstanding | Total price: $215 |