Asus A68HM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus A68HM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170804
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '21 at 12:39
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 50.3 1-Core 69.4 2-Core 116 46% 78.5 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 201 24% 185 Pts	64-Core 206 13% 206 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8572) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 4.4 3% 4.33 fps	MRender 4.4 Gravity 4 Splatting 5 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple TS064C 61GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJAA0201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 26 26 11 5.7 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 83.9 Write 41 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 20 12% 51.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 7.3 19% 6.87 MB/s	DQ Read 17.6 DQ Write 31.9 DQ Mixed 20.4 17% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 46%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 655GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 69 87 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 75 Write 80 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 86.2 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 949GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 94 88 91 94 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Read 114 Write 116 Mixed 104 SusWrite 91.3 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 695GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 11 25 40 26 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 178 Write 112 Mixed 86.5 SusWrite 25.2 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 113%
Covecube Virtual Disk 11TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 7TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 10 16 22 17 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 24.6 Write 24.3 Mixed 22 SusWrite 15.8 16% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.5 68% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 39%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB 1,262 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 156GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 1 2.5 6 1.5 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22% Poor	Read 74 Write 57.3 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 2.5 27% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB 4,966 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 15.7 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A68HM-PLUS Builds (Compare 494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	59x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	46x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	35x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	51x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	41x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16