Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A36
MotherboardMSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 10:56
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 277
87% 163 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 693
70% 570 Pts
64-Core 696
43% 696 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.55
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 34.7
Parallax 32.8
27% 33.4 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 23.2
25% 31.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY29V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 380 415 421 44 7.1 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 487
Write 435
Mixed 366
SusWrite 266
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 13.5
116% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 15.1
51% 111 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
405GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 108 109 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 58
SusWrite 106
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-8GB-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36) Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI A320M PRO-E (MS-7A36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback