MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 124
2-Core 249
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 691
65% 537 Pts
64-Core 932
58% 932 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 93.4
60% 77.3 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 76.5
Splatting 47.3
50% 63.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 263 262 266 264 262 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 357
Mixed 286
SusWrite 266
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 37.1
148% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 180
141% 196 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90%
Great: 114%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
667GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 101 103 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 72.8
Write 94.2
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 104
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$33
739GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 137 134 138 138 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 126
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 137
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 60%
0GB free
Firmware: 0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 48
Write 46.1
Mixed 26.6
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 27%
Verbatim STORE N GO 248GB
34GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 26 12 38 33 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 238
Write 42.1
Mixed 128
SusWrite 22.5
117% 108 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 9.4
841% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 14.4
DQ Mixed 10.6
920% 14.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 85%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
24GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 118
Mixed 42
73% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
87% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 CMW16GX4M2Z3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.3
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,019
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback