Asrock Z75 Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z75 Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '21 at 04:15
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 79.3 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 184 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 334 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 282 17% 282 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.9% Very good	Lighting 87.9 Reflection 99.7 Parallax 88.8 72% 92.1 fps	MRender 88.7 Gravity 87.5 Splatting 80.5 70% 85.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 Pro 512GB 1,084 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0522A0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 350 Write 314 Mixed 300 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 17.8 83% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 87.6 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 30.4 67% 132 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 129GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 19 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	2.57% Terrible	Read 24 Write 21.5 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 19.8 5% 22 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 1% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 2.57% Great: 121%
USB3.0 240GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 162GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 77 74 104 104 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 305 Write 202 Mixed 269 SusWrite 85.9 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 21.8 4K Mixed 17.4 58% 18.3 MB/s	DQ Read 53.8 DQ Write 44.4 DQ Mixed 41.1 33% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 62%
USB3.0 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 754GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 77 74 104 104 62 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	53% Above average	Read 98.7 Write 104 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 85.8 64% 87.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.2% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 14 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 81.9 49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z75 Pro3 - $105

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	77x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	72x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	48x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	41x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $72Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	13x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	16x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	14x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363