Asrock Z75 Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z75 Pro3  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 04:15
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 184
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 334
43% 324 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
EVGA(3842 4990) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.9% Very good
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 99.7
Parallax 88.8
72% 92.1 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 87.5
Splatting 80.5
70% 85.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Drevo X1 Pro 512GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 314
Mixed 300
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 17.8
83% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 87.6
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 30.4
67% 132 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
129GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
2.57% Terrible
Read 24
Write 21.5
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 19.8
5% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
1% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 121%
USB3.0 240GB
162GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 77 74 104 104 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 305
Write 202
Mixed 269
SusWrite 85.9
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 17.4
58% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 53.8
DQ Write 44.4
DQ Mixed 41.1
33% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 62%
USB3.0 1TB
754GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 77 74 104 104 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 104
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 85.8
64% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z75 Pro3 Builds (Compare 408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z75 Pro3 - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $357
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback