Asus H81M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	90.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-E (all builds)
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 27 '17 at 15:00
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4460-$194 245,403 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 189 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 377 50% 376 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 117 Parallax 110 94% 114 fps	MRender 98.2 Gravity 101 Splatting 103 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$85 19,345 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 333GB free Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 370 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (A5) Unknown 100 100 3080223 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 34 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 449 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 3 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 64 274879348762 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 34359738376 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 273 (EA) Unknown 100 100 350 (F1) Unknown 253 253 331 (F2) Unknown 253 253 214 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	84.5% Excellent	Read 487 Write 282 Mixed 310 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 22.9 125% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 45.8 88% 180 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 107%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 12218271 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 9440338119695 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 531 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 19 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 25 49 42952884249 (C2) HDA temperature 25 49 42952884249 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 12218271 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 12218271 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 12218271 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 120259084289 (E9) Unknown 0 0 4911 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2424 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2424 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2686 (F4) Unknown 99 99 2949152	56.7% Above average	Read 254 Write 124 Mixed 164 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 91.2 4K Mixed 16.9 117% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 100 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 27.1 46% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 73%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 979GB free Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6849 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2856 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 2937 (0A) Spinup retry count 157 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 492 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 18 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3227 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 240519151640 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 96 96 1689 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 210 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	92.3% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 163 Mixed 151 118% 157 MB/s	4K Read 4.05 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.31 244% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 120GB free Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 69 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896829620 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1121 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3091 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 527 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1121 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1121 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 223338954778 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.8% Good	Read 128 Write 115 Mixed 102 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.14 59% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 107%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 2TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 952GB free, PID 027f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	20% Poor	Read 40.3 Write 41.9 Mixed 38.8 52% 40.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.21 64% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 70GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 157 Write 126 Mixed 45.8 127% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.18 58% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 77,652 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 19.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	222x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	176x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	143x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	208x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	108x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	95x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	38x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $548

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16