Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20245

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLenovo 20245  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '21 at 19:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3612QM
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 152
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 383
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3912) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.07% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 2.6
3% 3.8 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.07%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$79
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 121 126 138 120 135 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.2% Above average
Read 279
Write 215
Mixed 194
SusWrite 131
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 31.9
105% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 36.2
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 44.4
42% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB
51GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 32.1
Write 22.8
Mixed 15.9
SusWrite 24.3
31% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.7
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 16.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20245 Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20245

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback