Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

Performance Results


Gaming 96% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X (all builds)
Memory	32.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201201
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '21 at 19:06
Run Duration	329 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	61%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900 12-Core 4,397 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 146 2-Core 282 91% 169 Pts	4-Core 525 8-Core 1,005 91% 765 Pts	64-Core 1,790 111% 1,790 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6286) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 136 Parallax 138 108% 136 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 140 Splatting 116 99% 122 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 467GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 1319 1337 1345 1320 1360 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	239% Outstanding	Read 1,712 Write 1,590 Mixed 1,262 SusWrite 1,318 330% 1,470 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 47.2 175% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 968 DQ Write 688 DQ Mixed 854 631% 837 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 239% Great: 410%
Hgst HUS726T6TALE6L4 6TB 792 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 487GB free Firmware: VKGNW40H SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 129 124 129 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 121 Write 131 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 127 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 1.7 6% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 28%
Seagate ST32000645NS 2TB-$292 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2TB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 149 149 148 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 136 Write 127 Mixed 69.4 SusWrite 148 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 317GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 92 93 91 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 61.7 Mixed 62 SusWrite 91.4 56% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 96%
Seagate ST32000645NS 2TB-$292 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 523GB free Firmware: 0004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 118 122 117 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 111 Write 101 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 118 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 88%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 48GB free Firmware: CC54 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 82 83 82 83 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 82.4 Write 55.2 Mixed 59.4 SusWrite 82.4 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 96%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB 649 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 136 142 142 140 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Read 117 Write 127 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 138 74% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.3 69% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 101%
Toshiba MG07ACA14TE 14TB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 166 163 166 166 167 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 140 Write 154 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 165 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124 3,845 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 664GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 107 108 109 109 108 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
ST320006 45NS 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 44GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.7 9.1 8.6 9.2 9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 68 Write 67.6 Mixed 49.2 SusWrite 9.9 62% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 50%
ST320006 45NS 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 656GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 91 98 98 92 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	42% Average	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 91.2 124% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 50%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 95 103 103 96 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 116 Write 115 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 96 131% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 60% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 4x16GB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 35 MC Write 31.6 MC Mixed 32.5 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 23.6 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 83.2 48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 148%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming X Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 171%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 195%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming X

CPU
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	45x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	41x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	35x

GPU
RX 6900-XTAMD $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples	18x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	17x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	17x

SSD
Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSabrent $100Bench 317%, 46,203 samples	13x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	11x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	10x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	10x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 103%, 778 samples	9x
4000 C19 Series 4x8GBUnknownBench 109%, 1,748 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Above average

Total price: $1,495

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16