Today's hottest deals

Asus X555QG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X555QG  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X555QG
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9800P APU (2016 M.BR)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Memory 18
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 80.8
26% 48.3 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 42.2
14% 89.8 Pts
64-Core 158
10% 158 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Asus(1043 13D0) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
2.85% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 4.9
3% 4 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 3.7
Splatting 2.8
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.85%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JU0C0J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 47 61 66 52 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 96.4
Mixed 42.6
SusWrite 55.5
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3270ME86H9F-2666 Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3E1 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.53 GB/s
Latency 335
12% 335 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X555QG Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X555QG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback