Today's hottest deals

Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory89.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '20 at 17:01
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU-A (00), 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 62
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 176
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 698
62% 524 Pts
64-Core 1,278
79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon-VII-$841
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.Q4
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 141
Reflection 116
Parallax 220
115% 159 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 156
Splatting 87.4
94% 118 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 1TB-$102
743GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 245 245 245 242 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
66.8% Good
Read 256
Write 243
Mixed 236
SusWrite 242
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 49.3
4K Mixed 32.4
105% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 108
106% 169 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 126%
Sabrent Disk Dev 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 188 189 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 153
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 188
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.5
300% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x484D5434324752374D465234432D50422020 6x16GB
6 of 8 slots used
96GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53.3% Above average
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 25.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7.3
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback