Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 79.1 1-Core 70.3 2-Core 126 56% 91.7 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 195 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4028) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.6% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 56.7 Parallax 51.6 44% 54.2 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 46 42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 46%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 278GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 64 84 57 87 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 154 Write 150 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 71 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MMXIV 1x8GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.03 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 5.2 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 82.2 49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	121x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	32x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	19x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	10x
99U5403-159.A01LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 52%, 987 samples	10x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28