bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BG
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '20 at 18:12
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User ECU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 95.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 180
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 502
53% 423 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 68.3
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 65.8
56% 69.9 fps
MRender 67.9
Gravity 69
Splatting 58.2
52% 65 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
466GB free
Firmware: 101140WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1178 855 841 853 860 860 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1668
Write 1,140
Mixed 1,474
SusWrite 908
291% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 47.2
179% 69.4 MB/s
DQ Read 715
DQ Write 536
DQ Mixed 672
490% 641 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 205%
Great: 284%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
247GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.6 8.1 4.6 5.8 8.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.41% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 2.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 5.5
2% 3.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 2.41%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x4B48583138363643313044332F3847202020 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.4% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 20.7
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 19.7
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 55.8
72% 55.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback