Today's hottest deals

Medion E5218

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion E5218  (all builds)
MotherboardMedion E5218
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091026
Uptime36 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4400-$110
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 35.9
1-Core 28.5
2-Core 48.8
24% 37.7 Pts
4-Core 48.8
8-Core 50.4
7% 49.6 Pts
64-Core 50.9
3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 22%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Device(1071 9525) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.35% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.43 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 0.8
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.35%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 165 133 183 118 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.5% Average
Read 220
Write 202
Mixed 205
SusWrite 154
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 14.4
61% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 87.5
66% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 111%
Freecom Hard Drive XSe 1TB
931GB free, PID fc8e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 22 24 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.5% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 24.2
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 21.6
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
WDC WD10 EARS-00MVWB0 1TB
611GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 22 23 17 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 22.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 21.1
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.87 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5218 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E5218

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback