Today's hottest deals

Fujitsu CELSIUS W360

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W360  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2587-A1
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090205
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$57
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 60.6
1-Core 29.7
2-Core 55.5
33% 48.6 Pts
4-Core 66.2
8-Core 67.7
9% 66.9 Pts
64-Core 69.8
4% 69.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 1700
Nvidia(10DE 049A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.00
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.4
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 8.4 13 12 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 63.3
Write 70
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 14.6
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 58%
WL1500GSA6472B 1.5TB
680GB free
Firmware: K0.02F.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 23 26 24 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 108
Write 88.4
Mixed 73.4
SusWrite 27.1
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.37 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 3.2
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W360 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback