Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '20 at 15:54
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 471
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 475
29% 475 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Lighting 92.9
Reflection 92.1
Parallax 93.8
76% 92.9 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 82.1
Splatting 74.1
72% 91 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 298 309 279 216 240 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 463
Write 312
Mixed 280
SusWrite 274
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 59.5
4K Mixed 38.1
127% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 188
171% 259 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST9120822AS 120GB-$35
15GB free
Firmware: 3.AL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 26.4
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 26.7
19% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 24%
Generic USB SD Reader 1GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Read 1
Write 0.7
Mixed 0.7
SusWrite 0.8
1% 0.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
6% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 0080 Elpida AM2L16BC8R2-B0QS 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback