MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7640
MotherboardMSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640)  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '15 at 20:47
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 79
2-Core 149
52% 114 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 556
50% 421 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 48% Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
40.4% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 36
Parallax 74.6
42% 54.2 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 55.4
Splatting 44.7
37% 44.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 185
Write 92.3
Mixed 120
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 7.11
59% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.1
DQ Write 94.5
DQ Mixed 31.5
31% 46.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
179GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
48% Average
Read 85.8
Write 81.4
Mixed 85.8
64% 84.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.59
127% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
9GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 60.6
Write 55.7
Mixed 56.7
43% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 57%
Corsair VoyagerGT 4GB
2GB free, PID 1a90
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Read 21.6
Write 20.2
Mixed 20.9
27% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.95
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 14%
Typical 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 990FXA-GD65 (MS-7640) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $640
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback