Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 46 1-Core 20.5 2-Core 32.4 24% 33 Pts	4-Core 42.1 8-Core 51.3 6% 46.7 Pts	64-Core 53.1 3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	5.2% Terrible	Lighting 6.4 Reflection 5 Parallax 7.9 5% 6.43 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 7.1 5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.2% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 142 176 199 200 206 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.9% Below average	Read 213 Write 238 Mixed 212 SusWrite 184 48% 212 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 21.3 4K Mixed 16.8 53% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 39.4 DQ Mixed 30.8 24% 32 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 134%
ST350041 8AS 500GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 170GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 93 111 116 120 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 95.2 Write 92.5 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 111 122% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,602 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 53GB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 84 83 83 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 75.7 Write 66.1 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 82.7 80% 61.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Kingston 99U5584-022.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF Kingston 99U5584-022.A00LF 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 7.9 20% 6.93 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.8 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 176 23% 176 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $396

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16