Acer Aspire 4820TG

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire 4820TG (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer JM41_CP
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110316
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 17:27
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Memory 62.8 1-Core 55.7 2-Core 100 45% 72.9 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 144 19% 144 Pts	64-Core 142 9% 142 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6500M 12,937 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Acer(1025 0358) 1GB Driver: atiu9p64.dll Ver. 8.711.3.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	2.09% Terrible	Lighting 2.67 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 2.28 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.09% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 29825 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 232 (B1) Unknown 89 89 133 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 105 (F1) Unknown 99 99 18569591914	40.1% Average	Read 220 Write 146 Mixed 152 38% 172 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 16.3 4K Mixed 13.8 56% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 94.2 DQ Mixed 52.9 59% 101 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 108%
USB Disk 64GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 5GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 15.7 Mixed 16.4 21% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 2.67 4K Mixed 1.57 156% 2.48 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.4% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 10.2 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.1 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire 4820TG Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 4820TG

CPU
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	9x
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	9x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	30x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	4x

SSD
BX500 480GBCrucial $38Bench 63%, 83,298 samples	2x
MX100 256GBCrucial $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	11x
PSD34G16002S 8GBUnknownBench 20%, 3 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16