Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics73.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory33.7 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 19:28
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 89.4
1-Core 126
2-Core 252
87% 156 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 680
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
PNY(196E 1332) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 80.6
80% 90.7 fps
MRender 66.6
Gravity 81.9
Splatting 74.6
61% 74.4 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 109 95 96 111 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 440
Write 324
Mixed 310
SusWrite 131
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 10.3
58% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 57.7
DQ Mixed 36.6
41% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$86
62GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,444
Write 2,215
Mixed 1,770
477% 2,143 MB/s
4K Read 51.6
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 74.2
236% 81.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,478
DQ Write 1,165
DQ Mixed 1,243
952% 1,296 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Intel SSDSC2KF256H6 SATA 256GB
43GB free
Firmware: LBFD07N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 116 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 478
Write 432
Mixed 407
SusWrite 124
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 38.1
130% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 221
167% 226 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
911GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 182 185 187 189 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 76.2
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 186
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
WD WD10TPVT-00H 1TB
897GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 75 79 78 79 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 75.2
Write 76.2
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 77.6
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 49%
LEXAR JUMPDRIVE SPORT 1GB
0GB free, PID a410
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.67% Terrible
Read 4.7
Write 4
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
6% 4.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.67%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 04EF TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 029E CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 21.1
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,571 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $346
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback