Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V5.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V5.3
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 18 '20 at 23:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 119
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 648
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 638
40% 638 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 7703) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 36.8
Reflection 44.3
Parallax 39.2
30% 40.1 fps
MRender 41
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 35.6
31% 38.7 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 111 96 105 105 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 487
Write 449
Mixed 394
SusWrite 129
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 45.6
157% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 169
156% 241 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
808GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 124 124 127 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 132
Write 116
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 123
71% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 32
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 29.1
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 28.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V5.3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V5.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback