MSI X299M GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B06)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics94.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B06
MotherboardMSI X299M GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B06)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 23:48
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
CPU0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 138
2-Core 250
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,110
98% 832 Pts
64-Core 2,214
137% 2,214 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Asus(1043 8623) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.5% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 136
Parallax 123
96% 126 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 126
Splatting 114
92% 112 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1955 1006 835 838 837 841 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,257
Write 1924
Mixed 1,670
SusWrite 1052
386% 1,726 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 73.5
266% 98.2 MB/s
DQ Read 991
DQ Write 847
DQ Mixed 920
689% 919 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 277%
Great: 340%
Mushkin MKNSSDCR120GB-MX 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: 609ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 94 91 89 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 376
Write 112
Mixed 188
SusWrite 95.4
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 34.8
145% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 137
108% 151 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 72%
Great: 80%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
865GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 100 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 99.9
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 57%
ST950056 20AS 500GB
405GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 102 101 101 100 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 104
Write 97.6
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 101
124% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 62
MC Mixed 39.6
139% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 10.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 120%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299M GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B06) Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X299M GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B06)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback