Asus BM6835_BM6635_BP6335

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus BM6835_BM6635_BP6335  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6835_BM6635_BP6335
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 22:27
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 173
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 330
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 505
Asus(1043 83EC) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.6
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 375 274 234 286 286 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 361
Write 392
Mixed 344
SusWrite 305
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 37.9
121% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 42.5
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 56.3
48% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5.4 4.7 5.5 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Read 17
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 5.1
9% 7.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HY64C1B0823ZY 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 18.3
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6835_BM6635_BP6335 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6835_BM6635_BP6335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $143
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback