Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 88.2 2-Core 173 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 330 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 505 154 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 83EC) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.7 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 211GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 375 274 234 286 286 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	74.4% Very good	Read 361 Write 392 Mixed 344 SusWrite 305 79% 350 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 37.9 121% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 42.5 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 56.3 48% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 128%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 5,405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 4GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 5.4 4.7 5.5 5.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	5.16% Terrible	Read 17 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.1 9% 7.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.16% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HY64C1B0823ZY 2x2GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 21.6 MC Mixed 18.3 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 67.5 59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	6x

RAM
TS1GLK64V6H 2x8GBTranscendBench 53%, 1,052 samples	5x
HY64C1C1624ZY 1x4GBUnknownBench 31%, 187 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 954 samples	3x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $131