Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate 5730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate 5730  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Homa
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 23:23
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$199
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45% Average
Memory 75.8
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 87.1
45% 69.1 Pts
4-Core 85.9
8-Core 86.6
12% 86.2 Pts
64-Core 87.2
5% 87.2 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4670
Acer(1025 013C) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 3.3
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 6.5
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 74 76 76 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 66.5
Write 92
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 75.5
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate 5730 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate 5730

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback