MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A31
MotherboardMSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31)  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '20 at 03:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 203
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 684
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 1104
68% 1104 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 163
Parallax 156
146% 166 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 133
Splatting 115
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 146 114 36 95 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 462
Write 280
Mixed 339
SusWrite 89.1
65% 293 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 37.1
140% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 200
175% 258 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
454GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 85 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 85
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM (MS-7A31) - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback