ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Latitude C840

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Dell Latitude C840 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell Latitude C840
Memory	0.5 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.3 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20040107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '20 at 08:07
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Mobile Intel Pentium 4 - M 2.00GHz 12 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Memory 63.5 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 21.6 29% 35.7 Pts	4-Core 22.1 8-Core 21.3 3% 21.7 Pts	64-Core 22.1 1% 22.1 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS721060G9AT00 60GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: MC3OA51A SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 33 31 31 32 32 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 17.2 Write 15.5 Mixed 13.5 SusWrite 31.3 14% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 22%
Sony Storage Media 32GB 1,268 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 17GB free, PID 09c2 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 1 0.9 1 0.9 0.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	0.39% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.8 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 0.9 1% 0.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 0.39% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x0.5GB 3,675 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 2 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	5.98% Terrible	MC Read 1.3 MC Write 1 MC Mixed 1.5 4% 1.27 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 0.8 3% 1.2 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.98% Great: 15%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $419

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback