Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 11 '20 at 02:54
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9500 9,059 User benchmarks, average bench 87% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.8% Outstanding	Memory 88.7 1-Core 140 2-Core 277 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 795 83% 668 Pts	64-Core 797 49% 797 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 94.8% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8591) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	101% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 139 Parallax 141 103% 135 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 134 Splatting 118 100% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKJ4.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 456 455 458 423 459 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 400 Write 125 Mixed 380 SusWrite 448 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 43.7 164% 60.1 MB/s	DQ Read 238 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 195 173% 256 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 27GB free, PID 559c Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 22 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 21 Mixed 23.1 SusWrite 22.9 33% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 79% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 12,524 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.4% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 21.8 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 21 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	1,632x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,232x
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	179x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	843x
GTX 1660Nvidia $209Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	484x
RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples	431x

SSD
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	297x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $34Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	221x
AS340 240GBApacerBench 71%, 10,970 samples	143x

RAM
2x8GBAdataBench 77%, 24,552 samples	364x
D12.2356WS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 81%, 464 samples	172x
D12.2324CS.001 2x8GBApacerBench 80%, 469 samples	163x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $432

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16