PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX3 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160505 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Dec 10 '20 at 20:00 |
Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.9%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
525GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 48 73 97 115 40 MB/s
|
61.5%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk uSD SDDR-289 8GB
4GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.5 MB/s
|
4.39%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk CF SDDR-289 2GB
2GB free, PID b6ba
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s
|
6.65%
Terrible
|
|||
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
197GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s
|
10.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 538x |
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 207x |
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 152x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 180x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $99Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 107x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 75x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $324 |